Pakistan's
First Big Sell-Off in 20 Years: A Big Step with Some Messy Challenges Beyond
the headlines and official statements,
Pakistan’s
first major privatisation in nearly two decades is being celebrated as a
landmark moment — and symbolically, it certainly is. But beyond the headlines
and official statements, the development paints a far more complex picture of
the country’s economic realities, limited investor appetite, deep-rooted
bureaucratic hurdles, and widespread public scepticism surrounding the
privatisation of state-owned enterprises (SOEs).
![]() |
| Pakistan’s First Major Privatisation in 20 Years |
The
breakthrough that many thought would always stay politically impossible has now
happened with the government finally deciding to offload its majority stake in
the national flag carrier, nearly five decades after an initial partial
divestment under the Benazir Bhutto government, where a small portion of shares
was offered through the stock exchange. In fact, missed deadlines and
eventually aborted plans—not to mention last year’s failed attempt—had turned
this exercise into nothing less than a cautionary tale.
Why It's Always
Tough to Privatize State-Owned Enterprises
The long battle
to sell off companies like Pakistan International Airlines and Pakistan Steel
Mills shows how politically charged and economically dangerous such moves have
been for several governments. Any government trying to make changes has run
into political protests, red tape, legal fights, and charges of selling
national property for very little money.
Investor trust
has also stayed low because of earlier cases where buyers were hurt
politically, policies suddenly changed, there was no transparency, and there
were long court interventions. These past dealings have made investors cautious,
thereby increasing the cost —both financial and political—of privatization.
Tidy Up Before
Selling: Unseen Expenses for the State
Though the sale
is being touted as a success, it must be noted that the airline could never
have fetched buyers in its original financial state. The state had to first
embark on a massive cleanup operation before buyers could be attracted.
Decades' worth of debt, losses, and pension liabilities were all dumped into a
different holding company. Apart from this, there were partial write-offs by the
government, plus generous tax concessions plus deferred payments, and several
other incentives to sweeten the deal for them. In effect, what was done was to
repackage the airline into a more presentable asset—a move that would assuage
investor fears but move large fiscal burdens right back onto the public balance
sheet.
What Buyers
Really Get
The new buyers
are getting an airline that now has positive equity, flies about four million
passengers each year, and has valuable international landing rights. These are
facts that underscore the long-term strategic value of the global routes asset,
which far outweighs immediate financial returns. It is in this context that the
questioning of the winning bid finds relevance.
The total offer
comes to Rs135 billion, but only Rs10 billion happens to be the real purchase
price, while the balance is a commitment towards capital investment in
operations and fleet renewal over the next five years.
This structure
has led many observers to wonder whether the valuation really does represent
what the airline is worth — or whether the deal is at heart about a state
desperate to wrap up a long-delayed privatisation.
A Symbolic
Victory, but Structural Hurdles Remain
The deal, which
resolves a long-standing deadlock and sends a positive signal to markets, does
not in and of itself fix the deeper problems afflicting Pakistan’s economy. Low
investor demand, limited institutional capacity, and resistance to reform
currently constrain the depth and pace of new privatisations.
This is far
from the norms of rational capitalism; many analysts have raised questions over
whether this new valuation really represents what PIA could be worth, or if a
desperate state attempts to finally conclude a privatisation transaction that
has been pending for more than a decade, fearing the consequences of an
inevitable labour disruption in the buildup to an election year.
But even then,
we should all wonder how realistic such investments are in market conditions,
and also ask ourselves a more fundamental question: Whether lines like ‘risk
factor’ will need to be modified before investors outside Pakistan begin taking
us seriously.
Final Thoughts
The privatization
of the country's national airline marks a historic moment that is undeniably significant. It is
evidence that even the most politically sensitive reforms can falter when
pressure mounts. But it also reveals the heavy price the state has to pay to
make such deals happen.
Whether this
moment marks a turning point for broader economic reform — or turns out to be
an isolated success created through exceptional concessions — will depend on
what happens with future privatisations, and whether we are serious about
learning from this experience.

0 Comments